In the absence of a transparent, regulated examination process with strict external oversight, the credibility of nursing qualifications is severely undermined. When institutes conduct exams independently without supervision, opportunities for malpractice multiply. Such gaps create challenges across the system:

  • For students: Graduates may receive qualifications without demonstrating true competency, limiting their employability and preparedness for higher studies.
  • For institutes: Poor teaching standards go unchecked.
  • For the workforce: Delayed or inaccurate result processing can postpone entry into the profession, causing a bottleneck in workforce availability.
  • For regulators: Ensuring accountability and maintaining trust in the quality of graduates becomes difficult without secure, standardized, and timely examination processes.

The National Nursing and Midwifery Commission (NNMC) Act, 2023 allows the National Commission to create a mechanism, through a final year undergraduate exam or otherwise, to ensure the competence of the nursing and midwifery professionals for enrolment in the National or State Register. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 calls for fair, and outcome-based assessment systems that move beyond rote learning and uphold academic integrity. An exit examination system with strong external monitoring is the most direct way to meet these policy imperatives, safeguard standards, and ensure every graduate entering the workforce is genuinely qualified.

To establish an exit examination system for nursing and midwifery institutes that is uniform, fair and transparent.

NNMC act, 2023 requires that professional examinations be uniform, transparent, and competency-based. The examination system must therefore uphold the following principles:

  • Universal coverage – All recognised nursing and paramedical diploma graduates must appear for the examination to ensure comparability and prevent selective participation.
  • Competency-based assessment – Question papers, practicals, and viva voce must align with NNMC curriculum outcomes and global best practices in assessing clinical readiness.
  • Independent oversight – External invigilators, live CCTV monitoring, and surprise inspections must be mandatory to eliminate opportunities for malpractice.
  • Secure examination logistics – Question papers must be centrally prepared, moderated, and distributed securely; answer sheet handling must prevent tampering at all stages.
  • Timely declaration of results – Results to be published within a fixed, pre-notified timeframe, with standardised processes for revaluation or appeals.

  • A detailed Standard Operating Procedure is drafted and notified, outlining timelines, roles,
    technical requirements, security protocols, and assessment methods for the entire examination
    cycle.

    • Advance planning and eligibility: Publish a state-wide exam calendar at least 12 weeks in advance. Collect fees only for candidates meeting 75% attendance and other criteria.

    • Centre approval and infrastructure compliance: Approve only verified centres with compliant CCTV systems; reassign students from unverified institutes.

    • Standardised and Centralised: Centrally prepare and moderate standard competency-based question papers.

    • Integrity and malpractice control: Deploy trained flying squads with real-time coordination.

    • Answer sheet: Mandate same-day secure dispatch of answer sheets via India Post.

    • Digital evaluation and quality assurance: Digitally scan and evaluate answer sheets through trained assessors and reviewers.

    • Timely results and re-evaluation: Publish results within six weeks. Operate a secure online portal for viewing & re-evaluation within fixed timelines.

  • The format for both internal and practical exams - currently conducted at the end of the institute - should be standardized by state based on expert inputs.

  • Publish detailed CCTV technical specifications for all exam centers and conduct multiple verification rounds. Any institute failing verification will not be used as an exam center, and affected students will be reassigned to the nearest compliant center. Engage a third-party vendor to establish a control room at the department for live monitoring during examinations.

  • Pre-assigned teams are stationed to cover designated examination centres, conducting unannounced checks during the exam to verify compliance, prevent malpractice, and coordinate with the central monitoring system for immediate action if required.

  • Theory exams are held under external invigilation and supported by real-time CCTV monitoring.

  • Sealing of answer sheets after completion of exams should be monitored via live CCTV Feed. Track the dispatch of answer sheets from exam centers to evaluation hubs.

  • A pool of evaluators (MSc or BSc with experience) should be identified by state. Answer sheets sorted, scanned, and mapped to evaluators for digital marking.

    Evaluation process – Key points:

    • Answer keys: Upload all answer keys to the digital evaluation platform

    • Assessor & reviewer nominations: Maintain a year-round repository of eligible evaluators. Invite nominations at least 3 weeks before exams.

    • Target numbers & rates: Minimum- 350 nursing assessors, 35 reviewers; 150 paramedical assessors, 15 reviewers. Daily rate: ≥60 copies per assessor/reviewer

    • Communication & monitoring: Create official WhatsApp groups for assessors and reviewers. Vendor shares daily dashboards with status, performance, and progress

    • Penalties for underperformance: Day 1- Warning via call/message, Day 2- Name listed in official WhatsApp group, Day 3- Removal and 1-year debarment

    • Reviewing protocol: Review ≥6 answer sheets daily. If >25% mark difference on 2+ sheets, assessor removed and papers reassigned

  • Results for nursing and paramedical diploma courses are published within six weeks of the examination’s completion. Results are declared on the website.

  • Following result declaration, students are given the option to view their answer sheets and request re-evaluation through an online portal. The portal opens the day after results are published and remains active for five working days. Students submit their request, pay the applicable fee, and receive access credentials for viewing within 12 hours.

    A dedicated help desk addresses student queries, while eligible assessors are appointed within three days to conduct the re-evaluation. The process is completed within one week of portal closure, with final revised marks compiled and published within two weeks.

2025 Nursing Corporation. All rights reserved.